The Teacher-Coach


Education is Motivation

A difference worth remembering

Like every Sunday this fall, yesterday was youth soccer Sunday in our household.  Back-to-back games for my 5yo daughter in the First Division and my 7yo son in the Second.  The results were identical: bad 3-0 losses.  Yet the experiences were hardly the same.

God bless ‘em, but my daughter and her teammates had absolutely no idea what the score was.  In fact, after every whistle stopping play she came cruising by for a high-five or a hug (which are getting more infrequent on the field).  Which meant she came cruising by for a high-five after each goal the opponents scored, big ‘ol smile on her face.  Loving life.

My son’s team, on the other hand, was miserable.  They were outplayed badly, frustrated constantly, and what seemed worse to me, they played “amoeba” soccer (everyone follow the ball) -  in stark contrast to their opponents, who for the most part stayed true to their positions and spacing.  As a result, his team wore themselves out chasing all around the field, then gave up the inevitable demoralizing goal once they tired themselves out enough.

Now, I’m the assistant coach, so part of this falls on me.  And what I could not get out of my head was how Un-fun it is for players when they reach the age to discern whether or not they’re competitive with an opponent.  If it’s not fun, then it’s useless to extol the value of sports to a young kid!  So what is my responsibility there?  To take the extra steps to make our team better, thus more competitive, thus more fun.

And the answer is not to play our “better” players more, or more prominently.  You may win a game or two that way, but is your team having more fun?  That’s the goal, remember?  Not to win, but to have more fun by being more competitive.

So I spent about 45 minutes after the game with the referee.  He’s a gentleman in his 60′s who has played soccer his whole life, refereed this league for the past 30 years, coached the local high school for the past 35.  He was able to explain to me the developmental stages that a coach can expect players to comprehend as they move from the lowest division to the highest, elementary school to high school, and gave me concrete tips and drills for each age group, helped me integrate more sport-specific knowledge into my general understanding of how to coach.

You can do the same, whether you’re an all-star coach or just a mom or dad or teacher out to help the kids have a good experience.  Find an expert, in person or online, and pick their brains.  Develop an understanding of how skills and tactics change and grow as the players move up in age.  Visit your local high school or college practices to watch the break-down drills they run.  And vow to help your kids get better every time they come to practice for you.   We owe it to our kids to do the best job we can.  For the fun of it.

Filed under: Performance & Competition

The Death of Subjective Values

Thanks to Carl Anderson via Scott McCleod – this is what I was thinking about with my instant replay post, only expressed much more eloquently.

Filed under: Pedagogy & Philosophy

“Subjected” to instant replay in the classroom

Quick mea culpa before I get started this morning.  When I began this blog a few weeks ago, I was determined to post every weekday. Then last week… the first week of school happened.  I’m determined to stick with it, though.

Anyway, I have been thinking for a while now about the ongoing controversies in sports with regard to instant replay, and then last week Derek Jeter brought it back to my attention once again.  Not the first baseball incident of the year – from the blown call that ruined the perfect game to some interesting calls that went both for and against my Phillies this summer – but it seems that baseball in particular has heated up the conversation the past few years.

I worry about the increasing creep of replay into pro sports, because so much of our enjoyment of sports depends on that “subjective” human element.  Who’s the best running back in the NFL?  The best first baseman in baseball?  The best defender in the NBA?  Well, it all depends on who you ask.  And that’s one of the things we love about our sports, the endless debates and arguments between impassioned fans of all ages and backgrounds.  So why do we need everything to be so black and white?

Furthermore, the more we try to bring instant replay into the games in the name of “objectivity” and “accuracy,” the more we bump up against those gray areas.  Did a buzzer-beater actually leave the shooter’s hand before time expired?  We can say for certain, usually.  Did that defender really bump hard enough to deserve a foul?  Well… it kinda depends.

We’re seeing so much emphasis placed on “objective” measures in society lately, and we see it in education as well.  If a student or a school or a district does well enough on a test, then they must be “good.” Ask a teacher, though, who the “smartest” kid in class is, and you’re often going to get a different answer than the name that was at the top of the standardized testing results.    We need compassionate, caring professionals who use their experienced subjective judgment to guide the process of a child’s education even more badly than we need that same human to guide a game to an entertaining outcome, yet we seem headed in the exact opposite direction.

All I can say is, when they put the grading robot in my classroom, Ill know it’s time to for me to go.

Filed under: Pedagogy & Philosophy, Professionalism



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: